home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0623>
- <title>
- May 16, 1994: Giving Up the Gun: Conversion of Hyde
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- May 16, 1994 "There are no devils...":Rwanda
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- CONGRESS, Page 42
- Giving Up the Gun:The Conversion of Henry Hyde
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Margaret Carlson/Washington
- </p>
- <p> Conversions are a rare and risky business in politics. Such
- decisions, rather than coming across as principled, are often
- characterized as flip-flops, an outcome of pressure applied
- not by your conscience but by dark and unseemly forces. Sticking
- with your own tribe is almost always the best policy, particularly
- if the side you are on includes an organization as powerful
- and well-funded as the National Rifle Association.
- </p>
- <p> But Congressman Henry Hyde of Illinois took the risk last week,
- announcing that he would switch from opposing the ban on assault
- weapons to favoring it. His change of heart may have made the
- last-minute surprise victory for the ban a certainty. His maneuver
- brought along many of the 38 Republicans who voted with the
- Democratic majority, including minority leader Bob Michel.
- </p>
- <p> Hyde voted against the ban in 1991 and is an outspoken supporter
- of the right to bear arms, applauding people who guarded their
- property with firearms in the wake of Hurricane Andrew and the
- Los Angeles riots. "I don't want to disarm the community. I'm
- convinced 911 might not answer when you need it. You may be
- all there is to defend yourself." This is the kind of talk the
- gun lobby appreciates. Yet the white-haired, 20-year veteran
- of the House is also known for his intellectual honesty. He
- follows his deeply held beliefs--he is a devout Catholic who
- is against abortion--but he keeps an open mind on many issues.
- In a fight where most minds are shut tight, that made him a
- long-shot possibility for the forces of Senator Dianne Feinstein
- and Congressman Charles Schumer, the authors of the assault-weapons
- ban. "We knew it would take a lot to change the Congressman's
- mind, but we thought if we could just get all the information
- on these guns to him, we might be able to do it," says Feinstein
- press secretary Bill Chandler. Still, Feinstein did not feel
- comfortable enough to cold call Hyde. Illinois Senator Paul
- Simon was enlisted as intermediary.
- </p>
- <p> As soon as the briefing book from Feinstein arrived at his Rayburn
- Building office, Hyde pushed aside the chaos on his desk, settled
- into reading the thick document with its seven sections and
- quickly came to the one made up solely of murders in Chicago,
- whose suburbs Hyde represents. There was Gerome Allen, a local
- basketball player who was shot with an AK-47 by another teenager
- outside a supermarket; the 7-year-old fatally wounded while
- walking to school with his mother; the Chicago Housing Authority
- police officer who was killed by an AR-15 as he walked back
- to his patrol car at the end of his shift. "At the end of reading
- this list of bloody crimes, I had to conclude these guns have
- no purpose but to kill a lot of people very rapidly," said Hyde.
- "It wasn't like falling off a horse on the road to Damascus.
- But like many things complicated and emotional, you don't dwell
- on them unless forced to. Then somebody grabs you by the collar
- when there's a vote coming up, the pieces fit together and you
- say to yourself, `This is wrong.'"
- </p>
- <p> As Hyde debated with himself, some of his supporters reminded
- him of the Second Amendment, which, he reluctantly concluded,
- can have its subtleties. "Certainly, the Founding Fathers didn't
- contemplate these weapons of mass destruction, that teenagers
- and grievance killers would have bazookas." Gun advocates, he
- said, "kept insisting you have to stop the criminals not the
- guns, and I'm sympathetic to that. But I told them the time
- has come to do both. We can walk and chew gum at the same time."
- </p>
- <p> But there may be a price to pay at home. The N.R.A. promised
- to punish those who voted in favor of the ban more than those
- who supported the Brady Bill, because that bill only delayed
- ownership of handguns by five days and didn't ban them outright.
- Hyde, who voted for the Brady Bill, recognizes that the assault-weapons
- measure "is a bigger nose in a smaller tent," and he anticipates
- continuing static from the pro-gun forces. While there is growing
- concern about guns in his district, it is the other side that
- is galvanized to retaliate. "The N.R.A. is a master at organizing--its intensity is amazing. The issue is as emotional as you
- can get, arousing more passion than abortion."
- </p>
- <p> Asked about Hyde's about-face, a spokesman for the Illinois
- State Rifle Association said, "It is safe to say anyone who
- voted for the ban is someone we'll be looking to replace." Hyde
- says he has already been handed a picture of Hitler, compared
- to Marshall Petain and accused of betraying his oath. The experience
- has made him wonder whether "people can honestly change their
- minds and still be fellow citizens and deserve space on this
- planet." The N.R.A. will let him know.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-